Page 55 - flipmag03
P. 55

R E   M A N Y         L I K E        I T ,     B U T       T H I S        O N E       I S      M I N E …







            BY dave porter                                         M4
         HPA























              TIPPMANN VERSION 1 AND VERSION 2





                                                                           I
            BAT TERIES                                   NO T NCL UDED


            A COUPLE OF ISSUES AGO, I GAVE YOU THE RUNDOWN ON THE V2 TIPPMANN    Although I do know of some people who had a
                                                                                 great amount of success with the Shapeways
            M4, THE CQB MODEL, AND BEFORE THAT, I TOOK YOU THROUGH MY EXPERIENCE   nub system  which is similar to Tippmann’s
                                                                                 original, but with a flat-hopped design that had
            WITH THE ORIGINAL TIPPMANN M4, AND THE MODIFICATIONS AND UPGRADES    a larger surface area and made better contact
            SHE’S ENDURED OVER THE YEARS. THIS PARTICULAR ARTICLE WILL BRING     with the bucking, my biggest problem was the
                                                                                 hop up keeping its position. I found myself
            TOGETHER MY THOUGHTS ON EACH RIFLE, THE SYSTEM AS A WHOLE, AND       having to readjust it constantly. The new hop
                                                                                 up though, is a markable improvement on the
            WHETHER THE TIPPMANN IS A WORTHWHILE PURCHASE IN COMPARISON TO       original, and not only have I achieved far greater
                                                                                 consistency, the general performance is also
            OTHER PLATFORMS. FIRST, A QUICK ROUNDUP BETWEEN EACH VERSION.        much improved. I do however have one caveat,
                                                                                 and that is that aftermarket options are still
            There are three main differences as far as I can   a stronger recoil than the version one. This is   better than the version two’s TDC. The fitted
            see, between the original and second version   referring to both rifles using stock components,   TDC is reliable, holds its position well, and is
            of Tippmann’s M4. The first is the aesthetics,   of course. I had to reinstall the original bolt from   very stable, however, the amount of hop you
            where they have moved with the times and   my version one to test this, as not long after   can apply is lacking just a little bit. I found with
            improved the appearance by adding a free float   purchasing it I upgraded to the aftermarket   testing that any BB’s over 0.30 grams suffered
            MLOK rail system. The original rail system was,   heavy bolt. The kick from the version two feels   slightly from under-hop, and this was with the
            well, in my opinion, hideous! I know, I know,   just a little stronger, and slightly more ‘snappy’,   hop fully applied. I know this is splitting hairs
            it’s all down to personal preference, but I’m   but that being said, I’ve been spoilt from the   slightly, but DMR builds for example, where you
            yet to find anyone that disagrees with me on   headache inducing heavy bolt, and both stock   may wish to use heavier ammo, might also need
            this one. The version two has a much improved   versions, unfortunately, pale in comparison. This   an aftermarket hop system. Luckily, this is a
            rail system, that’s far more pleasing to the   is again where personal preference comes in,   relatively inexpensive part. If however, you plan
            eye, however, even though I like the styling,   as the recoil may be more than enough for most   to run the Tippmann as a fully automatic and
            and I especially love the low-weight and slim   to bring that sense of realism to the skirmish, in   regular skirmish rifle, the standard hop system
            profile, I have to say that hand on heart, I would   which case the version two takes the lead.  should work just fine.
            much prefer a metal handguard. When you are   The third and final prominent difference is the   As far as differences go, that’s pretty much it.
            dropping nearly half a grand on a new setup,   hop system, where Tippmann have migrated   I like to think of this as ‘if it’s not broken, don’t
            you want to know that every square inch is as   from the 3D printed hop up nub which was   fix it’! Tippmann has taken what I believe to be a
            robust and reliable as it could be. I also think   adjusted from the side to the TDC (Top Dead   phenomenal system, listened to their customers
            that the majority of players who have invested   Centre) version which now adjusts vertically. For   on what they’re not overly keen on, and
            in this system would change out the handguard   me, this was the single most important upgrade   launched a second version that tackles some
            for an aftermarket option.         between the two editions, as I had nothing   of those issues. There are, however, still a few
             The second noticeable difference is the recoil.   but problems with the original stock hop up   tweaks I would love to see, and this brings me to
            Tippmann marketed the version two as having   system, until finally building my own TDC hop.   my list of necessary and unnecessary upgrades.






                                                                                         W W W . A I - M A G . C O M     055
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60